Te Kete Ipurangi Navigation:

Te Kete Ipurangi

Te Kete Ipurangi user options:


Oh, no! You don't have JavaScript enabled! If you don't enable JS you will not be able to use many of the features Ako Panuku provides. more information.

He kai kei aku ringa - There is food at the end of my hands.

NCEA

NCEA resources to use in the classroom for Māori Medium and English Medium.

New to NCEA

If you are new to NCEA, NZQA has some essential information to help you understand the basics of the qualification and your responsibilities with administering internal assessment:

NCEA how it works

NCEA levels and certificates

NCEA and the whānau

NCEA the facts

NCEA the myths

NCEA literacy and numeracy requirements

NCEA university entrance requirements

NCEA subject resources

Modifying Assessment Resources

Clarifications and assessment support material for various standards are available on the NZQA website, from the subject resources area.

Assessment resources for internally assessed standards are available on the TKI website. 

Some of the resources available include sample assessments, evidence exemplars and assessment schedules and these must be modified in some way – for example different case studies, data sources, or contexts could be used.

An example where assessment resources MUST be modified, is in te reo Māori, when assessing whakarongo.  Find following some essential information for teachers about modifying assessment resources (in a 'whakarongo' context for te reo Māori).

NOTE: te reo Māori teachers should use the current 2017 assessment resource activities from TKI when modifying tasks.  Why?  Because these tasks have been updated in 2017 to reflect the updated and current versions of the achievement standards (for example: the conditions of assessment state that all whakarongo achievement standards require student responses to be in English)

What can be modified?

  • teacher listening passages
  • student instructions – letting them know what the activity requires the student to do
  • task requirements e.g. what the student will be doing / questions
  • context e.g. location / place
  • time, e.g. day and date
  • biographical information for people e.g.  background
  • personal information for people e.g. personality, appearance, interests
  • events
  • problems and solutions
  • a point of view, opinions, or advice (curriculum AO’s)
  • the teacher guidelines section can be removed (unless you will share your modified task with other teachers to use?)

What must stay?

  • standard title
  • standard number
  • credit value
  • assessment schedule

What can be reformatted?

  • the TKI logo can be replaced with your school name and logo
  • the name of the assessment activity
  • the grey boxes can be filled in for example, the assessment dates should be included in the student instructions in the Introduction section
  • create Listening Notes boxes for each section so students can make notes while listening prior to completing the final responses to tasks
  • the spaces where students can write responses
  • the questions/tasks – as a result of modification
  • the Assessment Schedule – new evidence statements for each task that will be assessed. Evidence statements are the expected responses and show what is required at each performance level i.e. Achieved, Merit or Excellence responses.
  • the Judgement statements – those statements that give an indication of the quantity that is required.

Remember

  • You MUST have your modified assessment resource critiqued by another teacher BEFORE it is used with students.  
  • Once the assessment is administered, you must grade student work, and then get a fellow subject specialist to verify student grades.
  • Use the 2017 internal moderation cover sheet to support you through the critiquing and verifying processes.
  • Visit the Ako Panuku website page dedicated to supporting you with internal moderation

Guidelines to support teachers [DOCX, 782 KB]

Frequently Asked Questions with Answers [DOCX, 131 KB]

Link to the Google Presentation from 2017 Hui ā-Tau: bit.ly/ngohearomatawai

 

 

 

NCEA

Title

Description

NCEA and Curriculum Innovation: Learning from change in three schools   This report discusses the impact of NCEA on schools’ and teachers’ curriculum thinking, and on the courses of learning that they design and implement within the broader scope of The New Zealand Curriculum and its vision of the 21st Century Learner.  Teachers from three schools participated in the project.
 ERO Report: Increasing educational achievement in secondary schools  This report presents the findings of ERO’s evaluation of a short-term initiative to support improved achievement of a target cohort of Year 12 students in 16 schools. These were students who were at risk of not achieving the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) Level 2 by the end of 2012. 
 Tamakaiwānanga Māori Boys at Secondary School: A qualitative study of Māori boys’ motivation and engagement in NCEA Level 1 (Te Puni Kōkiri)  Using intense interviews with Year 12 boys, their teachers, and their whānau, this study explores the differences in the motivation and engagement of high and low achieving rangatahi.
You make a difference to Māori boys’ success Following the qualitative study of Māori boys’ motivation and engagement in NCEA Level 1, lead researcher in the project, Lisa Davies used the findings to develop some tips for whānau to help their rangatahi achieve.
Whāia te tamaiti ki te ako: Supporting and engaging Māori language learners in curriculum and assessment

The aim of this project was to increase the understanding of learning and assessment pathways available in te reo Māori for ākonga in secondary schools, and to gain an understanding of the factors that impact on these pathways.
Five secondary schools were selected Three schools were English medium (EM) and two were Māori medium or wharekura (MM).

Improving engagement and achievement for Year 11 Māori and Pasifika students

Celia Fleck is Head of Department, Health and Physical Education at Aotea College, and the Sport in Education project leader. She is passionate about continually looking for ways to improve outcomes for students. 
Celia’s school was chosen to take part in the Sport in Education project funded by Sport New Zealand. The aims of the project are improved academic outcomes, improved positive social outcomes, and increased numbers of young people enjoying and involved in sport. Celia viewed it as an opportunity to explore some innovative practice to improve academic outcomes for the target groups – male, Māori and Pasifika groups

Mā te mahi tahi, ko te eke panuku, ko te ako panuku



Footer:

Whakahokia mai he kōrero -
Feedback

Close x

A quick question from us:

Did you find what you were looking for?